--- This doctor is just as skeptical about the vaccine and Bill Gates as I am. Apparently, vaccines cannot be approved unless there is no other treatments for the illness. Could that be why the vaccine companies are hiding the info about Ivermectin? (sorry for video quality. The video sites kept deleting it ( I wonder why?), so I had to use my phone to record it directly)
--- 7 minute video explaining the origins of the vax for the coronavirus
--- Robert Kennedy Jr being interviewed by comedian Theo Von November 2020: Pertinent vaccine info at appox. 27minutes, then gets really interesting at 47 minutes. You may ask why Robert Kennedy Jr. goes on such random shows to share such important info? He says because the main stream media will not let him on.
--- Robert Kennedy Jr debates vaccines: approx. 27 Minutes in is very interesting. Furthermore, he explains that today's children have to take 72 vaccines vs the 3 during the time of Polio. Polio may not have been abolished by the vaccine, but rather sanitation/hygiene etc.. Since 1989 Children have become a lot more likely to be harmed by vaccines because there are so many more vaccines.
--- ScienceMag.Org Article on nanoparticles in the mRNA vaccine:
--- Is this virus just a really bad flu? (An0maly)
--- Doctor warns about vaccine:
--- Nurses refuse vaccine:
--- List of ingredients in Maderna vaccine. Anyone know what SM-102 is?
--- Planet Lockdown to Control Humanity (this one is more what people might call "conspiracy theory"):
--- Video Challenging "Germ Theory"
--- Why isn't there a vaccine for AIDS by now? Herpes?
--- Why is there so much vitamin D deficiency in the world? Is it because we don't spend enough time outside?
--- Here is an interesting blog post by a Jewish Rabbi about how the Jews in Nazi Germany were initially lead to concentration camps because of typhus. Could this happen to people who don't take the Covid-19 vaccine? : https://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2021/01/a-holocaust-of-public-health.html
--- In my song "CoronaCoaster Blues" I have a verse that says
" Please give me liberty
or give just go ahead and please kill me
cause I won’t take a vaccine
from your evil machine
I’d rather face the guillotine
than The Coronacoaster Blues
The Coronacoaster Blues"
I don't ever like to explain my lyrics, but I do NOT want to alienate anyone who wants to take the vaccine, with these lyrics. Again, I respect anyone else's choice on the vaccine subject. The "evil machine" is the pharmaceutical industry and anyone else who is leading "the people" away from more natural therapies because they are benefitting financially. I believe Bill Gates is part of the evil machine, but people are only as evil as we let them be. Bill Gates can't even eradicate viruses from his computer operating system, how could he help humanity with real viruses? We have to stop giving away our power and instead empower ourselves and believe in ourselves.
--- Here are some interesting thoughts proposed by an anonymous friend of mine:
Do some unbiased research and stop getting your info from Main Stream media and the politicians. There are some serious long term implications. They are using fear to coerce people.
Questions to Government we all should be asking....
If I get vaccinated:
1.- Can I stop wearing the mask? - No
2.- Can they reopen restaurants etc and everyone work normally?- No
3.- Will I be resistant to covid? - Maybe, but we don't know exactly, it probably won't stop you getting it
4.- At least I won't be contagious to others anymore? - no you can still pass it on, possibly, nobody knows.
5.- If we vaccinate all children, will school resume normally? - No
6.- If I am vaccinated, can I stop social distancing? - No
7.- If I am vaccinated, can I stop disinfecting my hands? - No
8.- If I vaccinate myself and my grandfather, can we hug each other? - No
9.- Will cinemas, theatres and stadiums be reopened thanks to vaccines? - No
10.- Will the vaccinated be able to gather? - No
11.- What is the real benefit of vaccination? - The virus won't kill you.
12.- Are you sure it won't kill me? - No
13.- If statistically the virus didn't kill me anyway ... Why would I get vaccinated?" - To protect others.
14.- So if I get vaccinated, the others are 100% sure I'm not infecting them? - No
So the shot does not give immunity.
Does not eliminate the virus.
Does not prevent death.
Does not guarantee you won’t get it.
Does not prevent you from getting it.
Does not stop you passing it on
Does not eliminate the need for travel bans.
Does not eliminate the need for business closures.
Does not eliminate the need for lockdowns.
Does not eliminate the need for masking.
So...what the hell is it actually doing?
--- Another Thought By An Anonymous Friend:
Which is the more reasonable approach a society might take in the outbreak of epidemic?
1. To quarantine the sick, and take reasonable precautions to stop those who are identified as vulnerable from contracting the illness.
2. To attempt to “control the virus” by preventing millions of healthy people from having contact with other healthy people.
To any society prior to 2020, it would have been obvious that the first approach is not only logical and proportionate, but the one least likely to have other unintended and highly destructive consequences. However, to my continued astonishment, many in our society not only believe that the answer is the second, but they somehow believe it to be based on established science.
Now I understand that many who support Lockdown will object to my characterization of their position. They will say that it is deliberately misleading, since it talks about healthy people, and does not mention the sick. Such objections founder, however, on this undeniable fact: Lockdowns are, by their nature, an entirely untargeted and indiscriminate approach to a health issue, and the prohibiting by law of millions of healthy people from having contact with other healthy people is a feature, not a bug of a policy that was untried and untested before it was first implemented by the Chinese Communist Party in January last year, then copied by many Governments around the world thereafter.
For some reason, many Lockdownists seem to think that the onus is on Lockdown opponents to disprove their position. But as Dr Malcolm Kendrick points out in his excellent piece – Does Lockdown Work or Not, this is the opposite of how things are supposed to work:
“The starting point, for any scientific hypothesis, is for the proponents to disprove the null hypothesis. Demanding that those who believe something may not work, to prove that it doesn’t, is to turn the scientific method upside down. You can never prove a negative.”
Even so, he goes on to point out that most of the countries with the highest deaths per million are those which had fairly stringent Lockdowns, and therefore the data so far most certainly does not show that Lockdowns are effective, even on their own terms. Of course, Covidian Logic always has an answer to this, which is that these Lockdowns weren’t real Lockdowns. They were too little, too late, too soft, too lenient, too short, too small, too purple or something like that! But they can never be wrong. Low death rates show they work. High death rates show they would have worked if only people hadn’t been bad.
But the main point I wish to make about them is that they are not something that has been proposed, studied or trialed before, but are an entirely new practice, foisted upon the world for the first time in 2020. Which means what? It means that they are an experiment in real time. It means that our society (along with many others) has for the last year, and continues to be for the foreseeable future, subject to an experiment. In fact, the largest psychological, social and experiment ever conducted.
When I use this sort of language, it tends to meet the following mocking response: “So are you saying it’s all a mass conspiracy? Who’s the puppet-master then?” But this just misses the point. It does not need some Dark Lord sitting over all of it in order to be an experiment, although it has to be said that the likes of Professor Schwab do seem keen on putting themselves forward as pretty good candidates. No, it simply is by definition a psychological, social and economic experiment by the very nature of the fact that the mass quarantining and mass masking of millions of people, which cannot fail to change the psychology, society and economy, are untried, untested methods, based merely on hypothesis, and not on hard data. In fact, the data is still coming in from this enormous experiment, but as Dr Kendrick says, it doesn’t actually look good for the hypothesis:
“…I would conclude that the observational studies had – thus far – failed to disprove the null hypothesis. In fact, the evidence up to this point could suggest that lockdowns may actually increase the death rate. In short, I would look for another idea.”
But the psychological, social and economic experimentation are by no means the end of it. We have now moved on to the medical experimentation, by which I mean the giving of so-called “vaccines” to millions of people (so-called because they don’t actually stop people getting the virus, and it is not yet known whether they prevent transmission).
Incredibly, if you look at the Pfizer BioNTech SE Clinical Study Trial on the US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials database, you will notice something very odd, which is that the Estimated Study Completion Date is on January 31st 2023. This is:
“the date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events.”
In other words, the medium to long-term side effects of this product cannot possibly be known, because the study is still ongoing. The long and short of it, as Professor Sucharit Bhakdi points out in this excellent interview (watch it soon before the YouTube Gatekeepers scrub it) is this: every single person now getting these jabs is effectively an unwitting test subject in the largest medical experiment ever carried out, having been asked to give their consent to receive a product injected into their bodies without being properly informed as to the status of the product.
Simply put, neither those administering these jabs nor those receiving them can have any idea of the potential medium to long-term consequences of these things, because the companies producing them have not completed the studies on them. And no, it is not the mark of an anti-vaxxer to be deeply concerned about this (I am not); it is just the mark of having one’s critical faculties in working order and of caring about what is being done to people – it’s called Loving Your Neighbor as Yourself.
In summary, both Lockdowns and the “vaccines” are essentially a mass experiment on humanity. The mid to long-term consequences of both are entirely unknown. Future generations will marvel at how the authorities were able to do this, but they will marvel even more at how millions of people acquiesced without much thought. None of this can possibly bode well. We need to humble ourselves and take a long hard look at what we are doing, or allowing to be done to us, as a matter of the utmost urgency.